Posts

Crushing Gazoo PT2 (Last)

PART 2: After crushing Mr. Gazoo in his original failed response to TEA, he has now submitted a new response, which will also be thoroughly vaporized. Thanks for trying your best Gazoo but you have done nothing more than embarrass yourself. My intent was not to imply that everything must be empirical for it to be convincing. Most would agree, however, that something as important as the existence of a creator God would indeed have to include empirical evidence if it is to be believed. And yes, being convinced of a proposition is personal and, therefore, completely subjective.  As I explained to you before in extensive detail , TEA uses not just the objective principles of logic to support its claims, but ALSO uses empirical evidence (as well as all the current reputable science to prove P1 and P2.) The soundness and validity of the conclusion is reached in the truth claims made in these two premises! Thus we are covered on both logical and empirical grounds. Some quick examples of this

RESPONSE TO GAZOO THE ATHEIST

  THE FOLLOWING IS A QUICK RESPONSE TO AN OLDER GENTLEMAN ON TIKTOK WHO GOES BY THE NAME OF 'GAZOO'. HE RECENTLY EMAILED ME A LIST OF WHAT HE FELT WERE COMMON REBUTTALS TO THE ELLIOTT ARGUMENT. UNFORTUNATELY GAZOO DOESN'T HAVE THE TIME TO DEBATE LIVE OR JOIN LIVE DISCUSSIONS FOR ANY EXTENDED PERIOD OF TIME. BECAUSE OF THIS I TOLD HIM I WOULD TAKE THE TIME AND RESPOND TO EACH OF HIS POINTS IN THIS BLOG. ENJOY - The Big Bang section is one of the most interesting and intriguing topics in the book. This is the part of the book where the rubber meets the road, and it is broken down into easily digestible morsels. However, that is not to say it is not without some problems.  For example, the author uses the widely defined term ‘singularity’ as “A super condensed, extremely hot/energetic state, where the first particles were allowed to mix and mingle….” But there are other acceptable definitions of a singularity in the scientific discord, such as, “Being no longer part of the reg
Image
      :The Elliott Argument: Atheism Refuted "The Argument that Buried Atheism!!" The Book is now available on Amazon!! Order your copy today https://www.amazon.com/Atheism-Refuted-Elliott-Argument If you want to follow This Argument on TikTok and get all the latest information please click here: https://www.tiktok.com/discover/the-elliott-argument  I f you want a quick response to the laughable Quora Article (which sometimes pops up in a google search of T.E.A.) have a look at this... https://youtu.be/hMxc1loAzbg?si=-Ohtnya1lnDOGLAI    And Finally... If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at caliqb22@yahoo.com or  Thank you What is T.E.A? The Elliott Argument is a formal deductive argument, rooted in science, logic, evidence, mathematics and philosophy, that is taking the world by storm. In over 750 online debates it remains undefeated!! Atheism has been refuted and no atheist even has the courage to try and debate it one on one anymore. The formal version

Righteous Indignation

Image
 God is a God of anger, justice, righteousness, and wrath. We are called to pattern our life after God and imitate him as our moral standard. What is righteous indignation:  "A reactive emotion of anger toward evil, mistreatment, injustice and or malice...  righteous anger is considered the only form of anger which is NOT sinful." We can know for sure that our  anger   is righteous when it is directed toward what angers God Himself. Righteous anger and indignation are justly expressed when we are confronted with sin. Good examples would be anger toward child abuse, pornography, racism, abortion, and the like . **Having righteous anger toward sin, evil, injustice, and mistreatment is a sign of having a heart like God. A sign that you are are living a righteous life. If anyone claims your righteous indignation is a deal breaker for them, what they are actually saying is that you being a Theistic Essentialist (and patterning your life after

REPENTANCE: The key to salvation

Image
REPENTANCE IS THE KEY TO SALVATION.  If Jesus said do it, DO IT!! Period. If you're a Christian, do what Jesus says!! This is as plain as it gets. IF ITS NOT AN ISSUE OF SALVATION, WHY WOULD JESUS BEGIN TO PREACH TO PEOPLE TO HURRY AND REPENT SINCE THE KINDOM OF HEAVEN IS COMING? ^^^^ TWO MAJOR POINTS HERE: HEAVEN REJOICES WHEN SOMEONE REPENTS...AND SECONDLY, IT STATES THE RIGHTEOUS NEED NO REPENTANCE TO GET INTO HEAVEN BUT OTHER PEOPLE DO!! *[[All the world renowned biblical scholars are also in agreement.]] http://biblehub.com/commentaries/romans/2-5.htm It is true that there are numerous Bible verses that speak of the promise of salvation, with no mention of repentance. These merely say to “believe” on Jesus Christ and you shall be saved (Acts 16:31; Romans 10:9). However, the Bible makes it clear that God is holy and man is sinful, and that sin makes a separation between the two (Isaiah 59:1-2). Without