Crushing Gazoo PT2 (Last)
PART 2: After crushing Mr. Gazoo in his original failed response to TEA, he has now submitted a new response, which will also be thoroughly vaporized. Thanks for trying your best Gazoo but you have done nothing more than embarrass yourself. My intent was not to imply that everything must be empirical for it to be convincing. Most would agree, however, that something as important as the existence of a creator God would indeed have to include empirical evidence if it is to be believed. And yes, being convinced of a proposition is personal and, therefore, completely subjective. As I explained to you before in extensive detail , TEA uses not just the objective principles of logic to support its claims, but ALSO uses empirical evidence (as well as all the current reputable science to prove P1 and P2.) The soundness and validity of the conclusion is reached in the truth claims made in these two premises! Thus we are covered on both logical and empirical grounds. Some quick examples of this